<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama is Politics in Three Dimensions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/</link>
	<description>Social Media, Geolocation, and Green Living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy New Year! And a Max Gladwell 00 Retrospective &#124; Max Gladwell</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-2306</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy New Year! And a Max Gladwell 00 Retrospective &#124; Max Gladwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-2306</guid>
		<description>[...] It would further the principles of Environment 2.0, Entrepreneurship 2.0, Objectivism 2.0 and even Politics 2.0. Shaped by so many circumstances and events, Max Gladwell has now come to personify the heroic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It would further the principles of Environment 2.0, Entrepreneurship 2.0, Objectivism 2.0 and even Politics 2.0. Shaped by so many circumstances and events, Max Gladwell has now come to personify the heroic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entrepreneurs: On the Importance of Focus and Targeting &#124; Max Gladwell</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1991</link>
		<dc:creator>Entrepreneurs: On the Importance of Focus and Targeting &#124; Max Gladwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1991</guid>
		<description>[...] Barack Obama: The President-elect set the stage for how political campaigns will be run in the 21st century, and it has much to do with his entrepreneurial approach. The Democrats started with an ambitious and unrealistic 50-state strategy. If it were a business plan, most investors would have passed. But it worked for Obama because he was selling the universal products of hope and change. Everyone wants to have hope, and by the end of the election everyone was looking for change. But Obama didn&#8217;t start by selling it to everyone; he started with a target market of brand evangelists. These were Obama&#8217;s early adopters, and they spread his messages of hope and change (sold his products) for him. By the end, he&#8217;d convinced many Republicans (Obamacans) to endorse and vote for him, including conservative blogger Andrew Sullivan, National Review columnist Christopher Buckley (son of National Review founder, William F. Buckley), and former Secretary of State Colin Powell. It&#8217;s worth noting that it happened in this order and that each is progressively more Republican than the last. In other words, Obama&#8217;s marketing spread from the center of his target to the outer edges. Had Obama started by targeting hardcore Republicans, the campaign (his product) never would have gained the momentum it needed for a freshman senator to become the 44th president of the United States. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Barack Obama: The President-elect set the stage for how political campaigns will be run in the 21st century, and it has much to do with his entrepreneurial approach. The Democrats started with an ambitious and unrealistic 50-state strategy. If it were a business plan, most investors would have passed. But it worked for Obama because he was selling the universal products of hope and change. Everyone wants to have hope, and by the end of the election everyone was looking for change. But Obama didn&#8217;t start by selling it to everyone; he started with a target market of brand evangelists. These were Obama&#8217;s early adopters, and they spread his messages of hope and change (sold his products) for him. By the end, he&#8217;d convinced many Republicans (Obamacans) to endorse and vote for him, including conservative blogger Andrew Sullivan, National Review columnist Christopher Buckley (son of National Review founder, William F. Buckley), and former Secretary of State Colin Powell. It&#8217;s worth noting that it happened in this order and that each is progressively more Republican than the last. In other words, Obama&#8217;s marketing spread from the center of his target to the outer edges. Had Obama started by targeting hardcore Republicans, the campaign (his product) never would have gained the momentum it needed for a freshman senator to become the 44th president of the United States. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brokekid.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack Obama Art</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Brokekid.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack Obama Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>[...] (via maxgladwell.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via maxgladwell.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Gladwell</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Gladwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>Joe: I wouldn&#039;t go so far as to say &quot;staunch&quot; supporters of the war. I give them no credit for caving in to the political pressure and voting to give Bush the authority simply because they did not want to find themselves on the wrong side of a popular war. That&#039;s what they saw at the time, and it turned out to be a very bad decision, both politically and for the world. 

But that error in judgment alone does not disqualify them as capable and valuable to our government. It is exactly like saying, &quot;If you were a part of the Baath party, then you have no business in the new Iraqi government.&quot; It&#039;s not black or white. Pragmatists don&#039;t throw out the baby with the proverbial bath water (no pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe: I wouldn&#8217;t go so far as to say &#8220;staunch&#8221; supporters of the war. I give them no credit for caving in to the political pressure and voting to give Bush the authority simply because they did not want to find themselves on the wrong side of a popular war. That&#8217;s what they saw at the time, and it turned out to be a very bad decision, both politically and for the world. </p>
<p>But that error in judgment alone does not disqualify them as capable and valuable to our government. It is exactly like saying, &#8220;If you were a part of the Baath party, then you have no business in the new Iraqi government.&#8221; It&#8217;s not black or white. Pragmatists don&#8217;t throw out the baby with the proverbial bath water (no pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>I do agree with your 5 points about fixing the GOP but I cant say I like the points you made earlier. 

Your rule of thumb should be: &quot;if corporations and big interests and the Washington machine hate it, then it&#039;s probably good policy&quot;. Thus far, they are pretty content with Obama&#039;s cabinet picks.

And your analogy (about the Bathis party) does not hold I&#039;m afaird.

People like Clinton, Emanuel etc etc, were staunch supporters of Iraq war. People like Summers, Gram etc were the architects of the financial crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree with your 5 points about fixing the GOP but I cant say I like the points you made earlier. </p>
<p>Your rule of thumb should be: &#8220;if corporations and big interests and the Washington machine hate it, then it&#8217;s probably good policy&#8221;. Thus far, they are pretty content with Obama&#8217;s cabinet picks.</p>
<p>And your analogy (about the Bathis party) does not hold I&#8217;m afaird.</p>
<p>People like Clinton, Emanuel etc etc, were staunch supporters of Iraq war. People like Summers, Gram etc were the architects of the financial crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Gladwell</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Gladwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>BigJohn: Depends on how you define a &quot;dimension&quot;. Could also be expressed as an X and Y axis, which could be four dimensions. The overall point is that it&#039;s a cube not a square.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BigJohn: Depends on how you define a &#8220;dimension&#8221;. Could also be expressed as an X and Y axis, which could be four dimensions. The overall point is that it&#8217;s a cube not a square.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigJohn</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>BigJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t the &quot;left-right spectrum&quot; be only 1 dimension?  Does that mean Obama governs in 2D?

Sorry, just had to point that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the &#8220;left-right spectrum&#8221; be only 1 dimension?  Does that mean Obama governs in 2D?</p>
<p>Sorry, just had to point that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AvangionQ</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>AvangionQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>What I like about Barack Obama, and what seems to be quickly catching on, is that he&#039;s a pragmatist -- I have hope that he will do what is necessary to correct this nations flaws and bridge this politically divided nation ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like about Barack Obama, and what seems to be quickly catching on, is that he&#8217;s a pragmatist &#8212; I have hope that he will do what is necessary to correct this nations flaws and bridge this politically divided nation &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Badenoch</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Badenoch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>This should be required reading for all Republicans.  Time to start fresh, guys!  Especially for those of us who used to be Repubs but couldn&#039;t countenance the antithetical Bush disaster (spend more, do less, kill everyone) plan.  

I look forward to seeing Repubs rethink themselves...and the new leaders that emerge for them.  Although, I like the &quot;post-partisan&quot; image drawn here and hope that has some legs post-Obama.  

Thx be to Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be required reading for all Republicans.  Time to start fresh, guys!  Especially for those of us who used to be Repubs but couldn&#8217;t countenance the antithetical Bush disaster (spend more, do less, kill everyone) plan.  </p>
<p>I look forward to seeing Repubs rethink themselves&#8230;and the new leaders that emerge for them.  Although, I like the &#8220;post-partisan&#8221; image drawn here and hope that has some legs post-Obama.  </p>
<p>Thx be to Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ErickB</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/11/barack-obama-is-politics-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>ErickB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=1002#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>Ha! So many crazy uncles...so true...

Michael Moore&#039;s phrase &#039;The Republicrats&#039; seems appropriate for your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! So many crazy uncles&#8230;so true&#8230;</p>
<p>Michael Moore&#8217;s phrase &#8216;The Republicrats&#8217; seems appropriate for your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
