<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Airlines Charge People by the Pound?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/06/should-airlines-charge-people-by-the-pound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/06/should-airlines-charge-people-by-the-pound/</link>
	<description>SoLoMo and Green Living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Gladwell</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/06/should-airlines-charge-people-by-the-pound/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Gladwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=348#comment-312</guid>
		<description>As insensitive or politically incorrect as it may sound, it just makes sense. How does UPS charge for shipping a package? By weight. It costs more to ship a 50-pound package than a 10-pound package. No one has a problem with that because it makes sense. I&#039;m sure we can come up with a way that doesn&#039;t embarrass people, but these are legitimate costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As insensitive or politically incorrect as it may sound, it just makes sense. How does UPS charge for shipping a package? By weight. It costs more to ship a 50-pound package than a 10-pound package. No one has a problem with that because it makes sense. I&#8217;m sure we can come up with a way that doesn&#8217;t embarrass people, but these are legitimate costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marguerite manteau-rao</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/06/should-airlines-charge-people-by-the-pound/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>marguerite manteau-rao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=348#comment-310</guid>
		<description>At the risk of sounding politically incorrect, I say yes, airline passengers should be charged by the pound. Why should I bear the external cost of someone else&#039;s oversize body expanding past the armrest? There is also the issue of the burden placed on society as a whole, in terms of sky rocketing health care costs, unfair use of food resources, over-reliance on &#039;lazy&#039;, gas hungry mode of transportations, and resulting increased carbon emissions. 

Not that I don&#039;t empathize with the plight of overweight folks. It ain&#039;t easy getting out of the obesity cycle, within our current cultural context. 

While I am at it, I would also emphasize another way of being more efficient with our food use:

http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/americans-waste-one-quarter-of-their-food/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of sounding politically incorrect, I say yes, airline passengers should be charged by the pound. Why should I bear the external cost of someone else&#8217;s oversize body expanding past the armrest? There is also the issue of the burden placed on society as a whole, in terms of sky rocketing health care costs, unfair use of food resources, over-reliance on &#8216;lazy&#8217;, gas hungry mode of transportations, and resulting increased carbon emissions. </p>
<p>Not that I don&#8217;t empathize with the plight of overweight folks. It ain&#8217;t easy getting out of the obesity cycle, within our current cultural context. </p>
<p>While I am at it, I would also emphasize another way of being more efficient with our food use:</p>
<p><a href="http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/americans-waste-one-quarter-of-their-food/" rel="nofollow">http://lamarguerite.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/americans-waste-one-quarter-of-their-food/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonight's Word: U.S. Airweighs &#124; Max Gladwell</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/06/should-airlines-charge-people-by-the-pound/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonight's Word: U.S. Airweighs &#124; Max Gladwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=348#comment-302</guid>
		<description>[...] of Social MediaGreen &amp; Clean Mom on Be a Beacon: The First Principle of Social MediaErin on Should Airlines Charge People by the Pound?The Wiki Philosophy of Jimmy Wales &#124; Max Gladwell on Wikia Search Has the Results You WantLynn from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Social MediaGreen &amp; Clean Mom on Be a Beacon: The First Principle of Social MediaErin on Should Airlines Charge People by the Pound?The Wiki Philosophy of Jimmy Wales | Max Gladwell on Wikia Search Has the Results You WantLynn from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.maxgladwell.com/2008/06/should-airlines-charge-people-by-the-pound/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maxgladwell.com/?p=348#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Those who are overweight absolutely should pay a surcharge.  Airplane fuel consumption is directly tied to the aircraft&#039;s total gross weight.  Why should I, who weighs 125 pounds at 5&#039;9&quot; and causes less drag, pay the same amount as someone the same height who weighs 200 or 250 pounds?  To keep things simple, charging only those who need a seatbelt extender seems reasonable -- even though it probably would let many who are overweight off the hook.   As an alternative, the airlines could set total weight limits: the person plus his/her bags.  Anyone over the limit pays extra; the number of bags per person would be restricted only according to how it impacts the total weight figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who are overweight absolutely should pay a surcharge.  Airplane fuel consumption is directly tied to the aircraft&#8217;s total gross weight.  Why should I, who weighs 125 pounds at 5&#8217;9&#8243; and causes less drag, pay the same amount as someone the same height who weighs 200 or 250 pounds?  To keep things simple, charging only those who need a seatbelt extender seems reasonable &#8212; even though it probably would let many who are overweight off the hook.   As an alternative, the airlines could set total weight limits: the person plus his/her bags.  Anyone over the limit pays extra; the number of bags per person would be restricted only according to how it impacts the total weight figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

